滕兆烜,甄永亮,金颂文.反设计辨析[J].包装工程,2017,38(6):134-137. |
反设计辨析 |
Discrimination of Anti-Design |
投稿时间:2016-10-08 修订日期:2017-03-20 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 反设计 叛逆性设计 返设计 单义性原则 |
英文关键词: Anti-Design rebellious design origin design principle of monosemy |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: |
全文下载次数: |
中文摘要: |
目的 辨析“反设计”这一设计学术语被滥用的种种情形,强调其正确的意义。方法 通过分析历史上的反设计运动、反设计意识,以及这一术语被不恰当使用的种种情形,对“反设计”的意义进行对比和辩证地研究。结论 反设计是20世纪六七十年代意大利的激进设计运动,以及由此衍生开来的与主流权威背道而驰的叛逆性设计意识形态。“反设计”这一术语的使用应遵循单义性原则,设计学理论研究中新概念的构建不应再占用这一术语的表述。 |
英文摘要: |
It aims to discriminate of the term "Anti-Design" in the field of design with it's correct meaning. Comparative and dialectical researches on the meaning of "Anti-Design" are performed through the analysis of Anti-Design Movement in history, anti-design ideology and a variety of situations in which the term is used improperly. Anti-Design is a radical design movement in Italy in the 1960s to the 1970s and the resulting treasonous design ideology which is contrary to mainstream and authority. The usage of the term "Anti-Design" must follow the principle of monosemy, and any introduction of new concepts in design theory research should not occupy the representation of the term "Anti-Design". |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |