设计认知的回顾与展望

Review and Prospect of Design Cognition

中文关键词: 认知科学  设计认知  设计沟通  信息加工

英文关键词: ion in Design Creativity:The Case of Staatsgalerie by James Stirling[J]. Design Studies, 2010, 31(3):207-236.

中文摘要:

      目的 以设计认知研究的发展历程为出发点，从设计认知研究现状切入，以系统的角度探讨不同因素对设计发展过程的影响，并对设计认知的研究方向、实验方法、研究成果等进行全面的归纳和研讨，旨在对未来的设计认知研究提供新的视角和思路。方法 根据研究侧重点的不同，将现有文献归类划分为设计媒介、认知刺激、设计师及设计团队四类，依次对划分后的研究进行整体分析、归纳及总结。结论 针对当前设计认知研究领域中缺乏统一的研究范式、研究内容碎片化、研究重点不突出、设计实践与理论研究结论存在冲突等问题，提出未来的研究应结合大数据、人工智能、神经科学等研究成果，采用更多种类方法对设计认知问题展开探索，提高理论研究成果在现实设计中的适用度。从元认知的视角探讨设计认知将成未来重要研究方向之一，这将更有利于分析和发现设计师在设计过程不同阶段的创新思维演变，并逐步建立统一的研究范式以及全面的设计认知研究框架。

英文摘要:

      The work aims to study the effects of different factors on design development from a systematic perspective by taking the whole development process of design cognition research as a starting point and starting from the current situation of design cognition research, and comprehensively summarize and discuss the research direction, experiment methods and research results of design cognition, thus providing new perspective and idea for the future research on design recognition. According to the research emphasis, the literature was roughly divided into four categories:design media, cognitive stimulation, designers, and design teams, and these four categories were analyzed, summarized and concluded in turn. In consideration of some problems in the current design cognition field, such as lack of unified research standards, fragmentation of research structure, blurred research focus，differences between actual design problems and laboratory research conclusions, it is proposed that the future research will combine the research results of big data, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and other research fields and adopt multiple methods to explore design cognition problems, thus improving the applicability of theoretical research results in practical design. Exploring design cognition from the perspective of metacognition will be one of the important research directions in the future research field, which will be more conducive to analyzing and discovering the evolution of designers’ innovative thinking at different stages of the design process, and gradually establishing a unified research standard and a complete framework of design cognition.