优化科学传播中参与进程的协同设计实践研究

Collaborative Design Practice for Optimizing Participation Process in Science Communication

中文关键词: 协同设计  科学传播  社会创新  科学咖啡馆  公共空间

英文关键词: collaborative design  science communication  social innovation  Science Cafe  public space

中文摘要:

      目的 提升科学传播过程中的参与质量，采用协同设计方式对科研院所内闲置空间进行改造;同时依据实践成果进行路径总结，为同类设计活动提供一定参考。方法 整体研究分为设计方案的构思、实践、验证及总结四部分:首先，构思阶段分为两部分，一是基于卡诺(Kano)模型的问卷调查，二是焦点小组与深度访谈形式结合的讨论，旨在获取与转化用户的需求;其次，实践阶段依托环境、产品、视传三类专业知识展开，通过设计学各分支协作将需求物化;再次，选取使用情况评估(POE)模型对结果进行分析，以评估参与进程优化效果;最终，将上述三阶段各类资料进行汇总，与院所内专家一同进行理论总结。结果 既定方案如期完工，满足了院所方的各项诉求;相关各部门通力协作，助力团队集齐实验所需资料。结论 协调利益相关，实现结果最优化，是协同设计最大的特点。就本次研究而言:中科院具备科学传播知识，并拥有长期举办“科学咖啡馆”活动的经验，这是本次实践目标达成的根本依据;我校团队掌握的学科相关知识，以及设计学科固有的视觉化优势，是各项设计任务能够完成的基础;院所内师生、行政及后勤等人员提出的宝贵建议，使本次的实践研究更趋合理。正是打破了三者间的壁垒，最终使科学参与进程得到了优化，且产生了一定的社会效益。

英文摘要:

      The work aims to transform the idle space in scientific research institutes by a collaborative design method to improve the quality of participation in the process of science communication and summarize the path according to the practical results to provide a certain reference for similar design activities. The overall research was divided into four parts:conception, practice, verification and summary of the design scheme. Firstly, the conception stage was divided into two parts:one was the questionnaire survey based on Kano model and the other was the discussion combined with focus group and in-depth interview, aiming to obtain and transform the needs of users. Secondly, the practical stage relied on the three kinds of professional knowledge of environment, product and video transmission, and materialized the needs through the cooperation of various branches of design science. Thirdly, the POE model was selected to analyze the results to evaluate the effect of participation process optimization. Finally, all kinds of data in the above three stages were summarized, and theoretical summary was carried out with experts in CAS. The established scheme was completed on schedule and satisfied the needs of CAS. All relevant departments cooperated with each other to help the team collect the materials needed for the experiment. The most important characteristic of collaborative design is to coordinate the benefit correlation and achieve the best benefit. As far as this study is concerned, CAS has the knowledge of science communication and the experience of holding "Science Cafe" activities for a long time, which is the fundamental basis for the realization of the practice objectives. The discipline related knowledge mastered by the team from Beijing University of Chemical Technology and the inherent visual advantages of design discipline are the basis for the completion of various design tasks. The valuable suggestions put forward by teachers and students, administrative and logistics staff make this practical study more reasonable. It is the breaking of the barriers between the three that finally optimizes the process of scientific participation and produces certain social benefits.