文章摘要
叶露露,陈永康.基于文献计量学的界面设计可用性中外对比研究[J].包装工程,2023,44(24):228-238.
基于文献计量学的界面设计可用性中外对比研究
Comparative Study on the Usability of Interface Design Based on Bibliometrics
投稿时间:2023-07-11  
DOI:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2023.24.025
中文关键词: 界面设计  可用性  知识图谱  Citespace  VOSviewer
英文关键词: user interface design  usability  knowledge graph  Citespace  VOSviewer
基金项目:2023年金华市哲学社会科学研究项目“创新驱动背景下金华市非遗数字化活化路径研究”(YB202342);2022年义乌工商职业技术学院年度规划课题“品牌建设视域下金华农村电商高质量发展对策与路径研究”(XJND2022011)
作者单位
叶露露 义乌工商职业技术学院浙江 义乌 322000 
陈永康 同济大学上海 200092 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 全面对比分析国内外学界界面设计可用性研究的异同,发现我国目前研究现状及问题。 方法 将国内外数据库Web of Science(WOS)以及China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)作为数据来源,通过科学文献计量学对现有文献资料进行可视化分析。结论 界面设计可用性研究国内外文献产出趋势较为一致,总体呈上升趋势,但近年来波动较大且有下降的发展趋势;工科、计算机相关学科的优势院校为研究主体;国内外的热点研究主题既有相似性又有异质性,相似性方面表现在研究主题总体一致均形成了四个主要研究聚类、国内外学界均重视用户研究,强调从用户角度出发以及均呈现出较强的学科交叉融合特性;异质性方面表现在国际学界更加重视基础理论研究,而国内学界则更多是具体的应用研究,国内学界数据收集、分析方法有待充实;研究创新性以及研究特色不强,亟需发展自己的研究特色是现阶段我国研究的主要局限。
英文摘要:
      The work aims to compare and analyze the similarities and differences in usability of interface design in China and abroad, and find out the current research status and problems in China. WOS and CNKI databases were used as data sources, and the existing literature was visualized by scientific bibliometrics. The trend of literature output of interface design usability research in China and abroad is consistent, with an overall upward trend, but it fluctuates greatly and has a downward trend in recent years. The dominant universities in engineering and computer related disciplines are the research subjects. Hot research topics in China and abroad have both similarity and heterogeneity and the similarity is shown in the overall consistency of research topics. For example, four main research clusters have been formed, Chinese and foreign academic circles attach importance to user research, emphasis is put on the perspective of users, and strong interdisciplinary integration characteristics are presented. In terms of heterogeneity, the international academic circle pays more attention to basic theoretical research, while Chinese academic circle emphasizes more specific applied research and the academic data collection and analysis methods in China need to be enriched. Its innovation and research characteristics are not strong, so it is necessary to develop its own research characteristics, which is the main limitation of research in China at present.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护

您是第20292646位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-4

版权所有:《包装工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039 电话:023—68792836传真:023—68792396 Email: designartj@126.com

    

  
 

渝公网安备 50010702501717号